The Friction Index

Small-Bay Is Where the Vacancy Went

Industrial vacancy hit a decade high. The average hides where it sits.

Metro Vancouver industrial vacancy hit a decade high at the end of 2025. Most of it sat in one segment, and it isn’t the one I’d worry about owning.

The headline number: Newmark put Greater Vancouver industrial vacancy at 3.3% in Q4 2025, the highest since mid-2015. By most markets’ standards that’s still tight. By Vancouver’s, it was a real move.

The detail matters more than the headline. Newmark put much of the vacancy in small and mid-bay space, after a wave of deliveries in 2024 and 2025. Large-format space stayed in demand.

It just takes a small slice of the market to move the average. Say a fifth of the inventory sits at 10% vacancy and the rest at ~1.6%. The market average comes out at ~3.3%. That reads as a soft market, while most of the buildings are as full as they were.

The split is illustrative arithmetic.

How a 3.3% average can form Illustrative arithmetic: 20% of inventory at 10% vacancy and 80% at 1.6% averages 3.3%, matching Newmark's Greater Vancouver Q4 2025 industrial vacancy. Bar width is share of inventory, height is vacancy rate. Small/mid-bay (illustrative): 20% of inventory, 10% vacant Rest of inventory (illustrative): 80% of inventory, 1.6% vacant Small/mid-bay: 10% vacant 20% of inventory Market average 3.3% Greater Vancouver, Q4 2025 (Newmark) Market average 3.3% Rest of inventory: 80% at 1.6% vacant

A fifth of the inventory can carry most of the vacancy. How a 3.3% average can form: bar width is share of inventory, height is vacancy. 20% of inventory at 10% plus 80% at 1.6% averages 3.3%, with ~61% of the vacant space in the 20% slice.

Illustrative arithmetic, not reported data. Market average: Newmark, Greater Vancouver industrial, Q4 2025, via Connect CRE.

The headline may have peaked since. Altus had Vancouver availability at ~5.9% by Q3 2026, down slightly year over year. The new small-bay supply hasn’t cleared, though. One small-bay building completed in Altus’s Q3 count was still fully available.

The question worth asking is whether older small-bay, with reasonable rents and a loading door, has gone through the same reset as the new product.

In the secondary markets I follow, the supply picture looks different again. Where little or no new small-bay was built, there’s no new supply to absorb.

I think this is the more useful way to read the headline:

  • ask which segment the vacancy is in, and whether it’s new supply or lost demand
  • check what’s under construction locally, not regionally
  • compare in-place rents to what new product needs to charge to pencil

None of that makes older small-bay riskless. New supply sets a ceiling on rent growth nearby, and tenants with options negotiate harder. But a decade-high average is a reason to look at segments more closely, not to back away from the whole asset class.

The open question is how long the new small-bay inventory takes to lease up, and whether older buildings nearby have to meet its pricing in the meantime.

All notes